Why Social Media Strategy & Tactics?

One may wonder what the big deal is with AU Social Media Strategy and Tactics (AUSMST) course. They may wonder what difference such a course makes. Well, I cannot answer every question but I can at least tell you why I enrolled in the course.

First, I enrolled in the AUSMST course to expose myself to an area of fear. Most people over 30 years old may be technologically challenged in ways that the younger generations are not.  This new generation have grown up with technology and seem to interact with computers and social media effortlessly. So, if you fall into the category of those over 30, you can take this situation as an excuse to get yourself stuck. Alternatively, you can recognize the challenges as an opportunity to grow. In that case, you will use it as a motivation to learn new skill and achieve mastery. While it is easier to choose the former, it is infinitely wiser and more empowering to embrace the later.

Second, since social media is here to stay, why stick my head in the sand like the proverbial ostrich and pretend as though it does not exist? To do so will be foolish and self-defeating. So, I enrolled in the AUSMST course to learn about a new capability that is transforming the world of communication and social interaction.

Third, I enrolled in the AUSMST course to learn a little bit of humility. As the saying goes, “Humility is good for the soul.” In the AUSMST course, I get the opportunity to set my pride aside and learn from young people. This too has been good for my soul.

So, there you have it. I am in the AUSMST course to face my fears, accept a challenging situation and gain mastery over a capability that is transforming communication & social interaction. Now, you know what motivates me. What motivates you? Please take a moment to chime in. I’d love to hear it.

More later as life unfolds…

Blessings,

Jones

 

 

Social Media: Are Younger Generations Better than Older Generations?

Not too long ago, I heard a college professor say that he has observed that older people interact with technology differently from younger people. Others have argued that younger people are better with technology than older people. Wait there’s more! Just last week I listened to a Social Media Strategy and Tactics presentation by AU students. They boldly took on these issues in their presentation. They compared and contrasted how older generations interact with technology and social media compared to the younger generations.

At the end of the day, it is clear to me that a difference exists between the generations. What isn’t so clear is whether these differences support the arguments and conclusions that many are now making. Does these differences mean better or worse, good or bad, ability or disability? Is not the important thing that each person, each generation, each age category gets what they want out of technology? Is this not the essential premise of “Uses and Grats?” I don’t know about you, but no matter the perceived differences in the pattern of use or style of engagement, as long as each person or generation get what they want, I assess that both generation are equally good.

After all, what is good if not the satisfaction of a desired end-state? Chime in and let me know what you think. Do you agree, disagree or don’t even care? Talk to me.  I’d love to hear it.

More later as life unfolds…

Blessings,

Jones

Social Media: A Liability Neutral Invention?

Everywhere you look these days somebody somewhere is saying something in praise of social media. They talk endlessly about its strengths, its advantages and its many tremendous opportunities it offers to individuals and for groups.

Above and beyond that, they say that social media provide historic opportunity to work for the common good. I recently read an article that talked about how socially aware individuals are using their increased social media connection to address some of the world’s biggest challenges. The article talked about Wikipedia, about global choirs being conducted over YouTube, about coral reefs being crocheted across continents, and crowd-sourced art paying tribute to Jonny Cash. In fact, the possibilities are infinite.

I personally have no problem understanding or celebrating all of these blessed opportunities made available by social media. The capabilities and opportunities offered by the contemporary social media is crystal clear. What isn’t so clear are its potential liabilities for today and tomorrow. While we seek to leverage the advantages provided by social media, we should also work to understand, acknowledge and act proactively to mitigate its potential liabilities. To do otherwise will be foolishness instead of wisdom.

Or maybe we think that social media is a liability neutral capability. What are your thoughts? Please take a moment to chime in.

More later as life unfolds…

Jones

Is Facebook’s Dominance in Jeopardy?

I recently shared an article titled, The Other Social Networks That Matter in Asiawith my twitter followers. I did so because the article raised some interesting point that I believe is relevant to any serious social media tactician, operator or strategist.

Here is a brief summary of that piece. First, the article says without saying that Facebook is neither monolithic nor invincible in an ever evolving social media landscape. The article highlights a number of potential competitions that are stripping away Facebook’s asymmetric advantage. The article refers to options like Path, Plurk, Instagram, Google’s Orkut, Zing, Kakao Talk, sLine, Qzone, Wechat, Sina Weibo, Momo etc. In light of this reality, the article asserts that it is a wise idea for companies and communicators to look beyond Facebook in order to connect with ever increasing global social media users. Finally, the article points out that the increasing popularity of these emerging social media options may indicate a diminishing of Facebook’s popularity with global users. Additionally, it may also be a foretoken of the trajectory of what the future social media landscape will look like.

Is the article right in these assessments? Only time will tell. Be that as it may, I personally do not think that Facebook face any immediate danger. This is certainly not a guarantee for all eternity as Facebook may eventually assume a much greater risk if it does act proactively to re-posture itself for future success. At least that is my assessment. What is your assessment?

Does Facebook have much to be worried about? Please take a moment to comment. I’d love to hear your thoughts.

More later as life unfolds…

Jones